In our April 15, 2019 blog post, we discussed a petition for review that was pending before the United States Supreme Court. The petition was filed in the case of Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, and it involved two bakers who claimed a First Amendment right not to be forced to make customized wedding cakes celebrating same-sex weddings. The Kleins’ petition explicitly asked the Supreme Court to overrule Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), a landmark Free Exercise case that motivated Congress to eventually enact the Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The Oregon state courts had relied on Smith to rule against the Kleins.
On June 17, 2019, the Supreme Court granted the Kleins’ petition but not for the purpose of conducting its own review or revisiting Smith. Instead, the Court granted the petition only to vacate the existing judgment against the Kleins and remanded the case back to the Oregon state courts for further consideration in light of the Court’s recent decision in a similar baker case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. (2018). The Supreme Court held in Masterpiece Cakeshop that there was evidence that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission’s evaluation of the baker’s case showed unlawful hostility to the baker’s religious beliefs.
The Court’s decision not to hear the Klein case may indicate the Court’s reluctance to revisit or overturn Smith. Smith held that neutral laws of general applicability which burden religious exercise need not be justified by a compelling governmental interest. In the wake of Smith, religious groups and civil rights organizations shared a concern for the negative effects of that decision on religious liberty in America. As a result their lobbying, Congress ultimately enacted RLUIPA in order restore heightened protections for religious liberty in the context of land use regulation and for institutionalized persons. Without the ability to seek protection under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, thousands of religious groups have benefited from RLUIPA’s protections. We’ve been privileged to help so many of them know and assert their rights in the land use context.
Have you recently purchased a building or land and discovered you can’t use it because it isn’t zoned for religious assembly? Learn how to navigate the process and win the right to use your property .Download Now
The attorneys of Dalton & Tomich, PLC have the experience and the knowledge to work with you to develop a legal solution that helps accomplish your goals. Our collaborative approach has helped leaders like you grow businesses and banks, develop and expand churches, and build nonprofit organizations nationwide.
In my role as Administrative Bishop for the Church of God, quite often we are faced with issues that involve local governments and municipalities. Many of these issues that arise in dealing with entities are land use related. I have found Dalton & Tomich’s experience and expertise in this area to be a valuable resource and asset in every situation.
Never one time during a year-long litigation process did Dalton & Tomich demonstrate anything other than Christ-like professionalism. They managed the legal details, while we continued to do church. How they managed themselves, managed our case, and represented our church set the table for me and our church to be where we are today.
Dalton & Tomich’s expertise and experience helped us through a very difficult legal journey, ultimately achieving a favorable outcome. Their personal interest in helping us went “above and beyond” just the call of duty.