Last week, the Sixth Circuit reversed a decision from the Eastern District of Michigan which held that a church lacked standing to challenge police investigations into complaints about noise violations from the church during services, concerts and rehearsals. In Faith Baptist Church v. Waterford Township, Faith Baptist held youth religious services at which a band played contemporary Christian rock music.
The matter began when Township residents complained to the local police department that the Church’s music was too loud. The Township’s prosecuting attorney spoke with the Church’s pastor, and told him the Church should not be playing rock music and that he was going to issue tickets to the Church until it stopped playing the music. Police officials also threatened to charge Church members for disturbing the peace. Despite the Township’s repeated warnings and threats that it would bring charges against Church members for violating the noise ordinance, no members were ultimately charged.
The Church thereafter filed suit against the Township, asserting various claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that the Township violated the Church’s constitutional rights to free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of association under the First Amendment, and to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Township argued that since no Church members were charged with disturbing the peace, the Church lacked standing to raise these claims. The district court agreed with the Township and dismissed all of the Church’s First Amendment claims, finding the Church lacked standing to raise the claims because it had not articulated a concrete or particularized injury.
On appeal, the Sixth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of the Church’s First Amendment claims. The Court found that the Church had standing to raise the claims because it demonstrated that it had a reasonable fear that its speech, free exercise of religion, and freedom of association would be chilled by the Township’s conduct. Namely, the fact that the Township made a credible threat that it would enforce its noise ordinance, even though it did not ultimately do so, was sufficient to create a concrete and particularized injury to the Church.
The attorneys at Dalton & Tomich, plc have extensive experience representing religious institutions and individuals whose First Amendment rights have been violated by local governments. If you feel that your constitutional rights or the constitutional rights of your religious institution have been violated, please contact us to further discuss your matter.
If you would like to read the Sixth Circuit’s full opinion, it is available at https://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/13a0363n-06.pdf.
The attorneys of Dalton & Tomich, PLC have the experience and the knowledge to work with you to develop a legal solution that helps accomplish your goals. Our collaborative approach has helped leaders like you grow businesses and banks, develop and expand churches, and build nonprofit organizations nationwide.
In my role as Administrative Bishop for the Church of God, quite often we are faced with issues that involve local governments and municipalities. Many of these issues that arise in dealing with entities are land use related. I have found Dalton & Tomich’s experience and expertise in this area to be a valuable resource and asset in every situation.
Never one time during a year-long litigation process did Dalton & Tomich demonstrate anything other than Christ-like professionalism. They managed the legal details, while we continued to do church. How they managed themselves, managed our case, and represented our church set the table for me and our church to be where we are today.
Dalton & Tomich’s expertise and experience helped us through a very difficult legal journey, ultimately achieving a favorable outcome. Their personal interest in helping us went “above and beyond” just the call of duty.